The 5 Best Tennis Rackets For Doubles

The 5 Best Tennis Rackets For Doubles

Recent Articles

Novak’s Player Relief Fund: Why it Needs to Happen Now


By Martin Redlicki

May 11, 2020

Disclaimer: The following piece was written by a guest writer. This writer‘s views do not necessarily align with ours at MyTennisHQ.

The coronavirus pandemic has wreaked havoc across virtually all facets of life around the entire planet. Joblessness is at an all time high, and among those out of work are aspiring professional tennis players. Within the last couple of weeks, the ATP and the ITF, two of the sports main governing bodies, proposed a somewhat controversial plan to create a player relief fund. The reason for the controversy is that top players are being asked to take on the financial responsibility of the relief fund, with increased contribution for higher ranked players. The goal of the player relief fund is to financially assist players ranked between 250-700, a range deemed by the governing bodies and top players as “the future of the sport”, and players that make the majority of their income by playing in professional tennis tournaments. Several top players have commented on the player relief fund, with some players showing support and others strongly condemning the idea. I personally believe that the player relief fund is a good idea to financially assist the aspiring pros that are looking to climb the rankings, with the goals and dreams of making it to the top, like the players they are currently looking up to. 

With the target ranking range of the fund being 250-700, it is mainly aimed at helping players that have shown they have what it takes to climb the rankings and eventually make it to the grand slam level, but have not had the required amount of time and/or professional playing experience to make it all the way there. These players, such as myself, mainly compete in the “Futures” and “Challenger” levels of the sport, comparable to baseball’s minor leagues. By reaching a ranking of at least 700 in the world, a player essentially proves that he has the ability to consistently win matches at the entry level of the sport, and has the ability to progress to the higher levels of the sport. However, the current world climate has completely halted the players’ ability to earn ranking points and an income, essentially leaving them completely stagnant with no possibility to progress.

The goal of the player relief fund is to provide these distinguished players a monetary grant of $10,000 each, which is intended to help them survive these difficult times, as well as to be able to continue their training and pursuit of making it to the top of the game. Unfortunately at the entry levels of the sport, players do not earn enough money to put away and save. Most of their income gets funneled back into their careers, an investment in order to progress forward. With no way of making money from tournaments, many players will be forced to quit the sport to which they’ve devoted their entire lives, simply because they cannot afford to pursue their career. The money from the player grant would help players keep their lives and careers on track, and could help many players continue playing the sport as opposed to being forced to quit. Nick Kyrgios, a supporter of the player relief fund, understands the importance of supporting lower ranked players to help continue the sport grow and prosper, and to create a pathway for future generations of players.

One of the main opponents of the player relief fund is Dominic Theim, currently ranked number 3 in the world, and is widely regarded as one of the hardest working players on tour. Through his hard work, he was able to elevate his ranking from 950 in the world when he played in his first professional event in 2010, all the way to where he currently sits as world number 3. His ranking climb followed a relatively standard path for players that end up breaking through to the top of the game, with his year end 2010 ranking being 921, his year end 2011 ranking being 638, his year end 2012 ranking being 309, before his year end 2013 ranking being 139. He then proceeded to break the top 100 in the rankings the first month of 2014. 

A couple of weeks ago, Thiem made some inflammatory remarks towards the lower ranked players of the sport in response to supporting the player relief fund for those players, saying that, “none of them have to fight for their lives… many of them are quite unprofessional.” Personally, I couldn’t disagree more with the statement he made, as it is for the most part simply not true. He himself is an excellent example. Based on his ranking progression outlined above, it took Thiem a full 2 years on tour before his ranking resembled that of being among the game’s most elite. In those two years, he gained the experience that is so often needed to break through in tennis. What he is failing to see is that it is not the lack of professionalism that is holding lower ranked players back, but the impact that COVID-19 is having on the world and the lack of opportunity that players have to earn ranking points and income. Had this global pandemic happened in 2012 when he was building his ranking, he would have been the exact player that he is currently ridiculing and dismissing. 

Thiem is the perfect example of why the player relief fund is so important for the growing of the sport. Had he been sidelined by a global pandemic in his ascent of the rankings and never had the opportunity to break through, there is a chance that he could have been forced to quit the game he loves due to intense financial pressures like so many players are currently facing. I believe that most, if not all of the players in the target ranking for the relief fund have the potential to be just like Thiem and need to be given the opportunity to do so. Tennis is an individual sport, and players oftentimes do not have major organizations or sponsors backing them at the early stages of their careers. In contrast, the top players often make substantial money from both their sponsors and on court performance. I think it’s important that the top players in the game take initiative to give tennis, a sport that has given them so much, the opportunity to thrive for generations to come. 

MyTennisHQ.com wants to hear your expert opinion on topics in the tennis world such as this one. Want to express your thoughts? Here is your platform. Send us a message on instagram @mytennishq and we will give you the details you need to start writing.

Martin Redlicki started playing professionally after finishing his career at UCLA in 2018. He is currently ranked ATP #503 in singles and #200 in doubles. Find him on instagram @martinredlicki.

Tennis Terms Meanings: The Ultimate List (A to Z)


Tennis Terms Meanings - The Ultimate List (A to Z)

Tennis can be quite an overwhelming sport when you’re just starting, as you need to not only learn how to hit your shots but also need to learn what everything means and how they are connected. If you feel like you can use some clarity on what some tennis terms mean, you have come to the right place. 

Below we have compiled a list of all the tennis terms you need to know, accompanied by their meaning and/or definition. This list was written by a former college and professional tennis player, and it was written in a way that even beginners can understand.

If by any chance you have a term that you still cannot understand or that is not on this list, please let us know in the comment section below and we’ll get back to you with an answer.

Tennis Terms – A

Ace: An ace happens when a player hits a serve that cannot be returned by his or her opponent. It usually means that it was a great serve.

Ad-In & Ad-Out: This is another way to refer to the points that come after 40×40 in the tennis scoring system (see Advantage). If the game is tied at 40×40, Player A is serving, and Player A wins the point, the score will be Ad-In. On the other hand, if the player who is receiving wins the point, the score will be Ad-Out.

Advantage: Tennis has a complex scoring system, and the term advantage is used to count the point that comes after the game is tied at 40×40 (deuce). If the game is tied at 40×40 and Player A wins the point, the score will then be “Advantage Player A”.

Alley: The portion of the court that is used only during doubles matches. Also called doubles alley, you can think of it as an “extension” to the singles court.

Approach Shot: Approach shots can be executed using either the forehand or the backhand, and they can be hit with either slice or topspin. All it means is that the player is hitting a shot and then transitioning to the net, or “approaching” the net. 

ATP: ATP stands for Association of Tennis Professionals. This is the organization that rules pretty much everything related to the men’s tennis at the top level (with the exception of Grand Slams). They have a say on rankings, tournaments, and tennis rules. 

Australian Open: The first Grand Slam of the year, the tournament is played in Melbourne in January and is played on hard courts.

Tennis Terms – B

Backhand: The backhand is another one of the main shots in a tennis game. It is the equivalent of the forehand but executed on the player’s non-dominant side. For instance, if a player is right-handed, the backhand will be executed on the left side. If a player is left-handed, the backhand will be executed on the right side. The reason why backhands are called that is that the back of the player’s dominant hand is facing the opponent. Backhands can either be one-handed or two-handed.

Bagel: Informal term to refer to a set with a score of 6×0. You don’t want to get a “bagel” – it can be humiliating. 

Ball Abuse: If, out of frustration or anger, a player hits a ball in an aggressive way (while not in play), whether directed towards the opponent, the crowd, the umpire, or anywhere else in his or her surroundings, he or she will have committed a ball abuse. During the match, the player will either receive a warning, a point penalty, or a game penalty – all of which may or may not be accompanied by fines.

Baseline: The baseline indicates the boundary of the court lengthwise. It serves two purposes: 1) When a player is serving, he or she must stand behind the baseline; and 2) If a player hits a shot that lands past the baseline, the shot is considered out and the player will lose the point.

Breakpoint: If a player is receiving (returning), and he or she gets to a score of 0x40, 15×40, 30×40, or Ad-Out, he or she will have a breakpoint. It means that he or she is one point away from “breaking” their opponent’s serve.

Bye: A bye happens when a player advances through the first round of a tournament without having to play – usually because he or she is one of the top ranked players in the tournament (see seed).

Tennis Terms – C

Call: A call is an indication of whether a shot was IN or OUT. They are usually referred to as line calls, and at the top level, they are done by umpires. At the club level, players make their own calls.

Carpet: One of the 4 most common court surfaces, even though there are no ATP or Grand Slams played on it anymore. This is one of the fastest court surfaces you can play on. 

Challenge: At the top level tournaments, players can “challenge” line calls they do not agree with. They are allowed a certain amount of challenges during each set, and they need to let the umpire know when they want to challenge a call. If that happens, a video-analysis of the shot will be replayed and show whether the shot was in or out.

Challenger: The level of tournaments that comes before the “big league ones” (ATP Tournaments). These tournaments are usually played by players ranked between 80 and 350 in the world, and they offer significantly less prize money than top tournaments.

Changeover: A changeover is the term used for when players need to switch sides on the court. It happens once after the very first game of each set, then after every 2 games played.

Chip-And-Charge: When a player returns a serve using a slice shot and goes to the net immediately after.

Clay Court: Clay courts are the second most frequently seen courts on tour, being extremely popular in South America and Europe. It is the surface of the French Open, and it is a slow and bouncy surface.

Code Violation: A code violation is a punishment given to a player by an umpire because the player acted in a way that goes against the Code of Conduct. It is usually because the player received coaching, or because the player committed a ball, racket, or verbal abuse.

Continental: The continental grip is a way to grip the racket when you are playing. The Continental grip is the foundation of every beginner tennis player’s game. Since this grip is ideal for shots like serves, slices, volleys, and overheads, beginners end up using this grip for every stroke so they don’t have to worry about changing grips. 

Crosscourt: A crosscourt shot happens when you hit the shot diagonally across the court. So if you hit a shot from your forehand to your opponent’s forehand, that would be considered a crosscourt shot.

Tennis Terms – D

Dampener: A vibration dampener is a small accessory you can add to your racket in order to reduce the vibration feeling when you hit the ball. 

Deuce: The term used to refer to a score of 40×40.

Double Fault: Each point, the server has two serves to start the point. If the player fails to hit one of those serves inside the service box, he or she will have committed a double fault – which means he or she will have lost the point.

Down The Line: A down the line shot is the opposite of a cross court shot. If you hit a shot from your forehand to an opponent’s backhand, it will generally be considered a down-the-line shot.

Draw: A draw in tennis is the structure of a tennis tournament that establishes who each player will face and in which round. It is usually determined by placing a few seeds in predetermined spots and then randomly drawing the players for the other spots.

Dropshot: A dropshot is a type of tennis shot in which you are trying to hit a short ball in hopes that it will bounce twice before your opponent can reach it.

Tennis Terms – E

Eastern: The Eastern Forehand group allows players to hit forehands with more topspin than Continental grips, yet less than Semi-Western ones. The Eastern forehand grip is great if you play mostly on fast surfaces, since it allows you to hit flat shots and to quickly switch grips between forehand and serves or slices. While this grip is more popular than the Continental grip, it is not used by many players. The reason behind it is that it can cause a lot of stress on your wrist. Juan Martin del Potro is the only player who hits forehands with a true Eastern grip

Error: When a player misses a shot during a point, whether by hitting the ball at the net or by landing the shot outside of the court lines. 

Tennis Terms – F

Fifteen: In tennis, fifteen is the value of the first point played in a game. The scoring within a game starts at 0x0, and depending on who wins the first point, the score goes to either 15×0 or 0x15.

Follow-Through: Follow through is a technical term for the path the player’s racket goes through after the racket makes contact with the ball.

Forced Error: Unlike unforced errors, forced errors happen because a player’s opponent hit a good shot that caused the player to miss. The forced error is due to the opponent’s merit rather than the player’s fault.

Forehand: Forehands are, for the vast majority of players, their strongest weapon. A player hits a forehand when he allows the ball to bounce once on his court before hitting it, and hits it with his dominant side. With very few exceptions, players hit forehands using only one arm. The reason why forehands are called forehands is because normally, the front (fore) of your hand holding the racquet will be facing your opponent.

Forty: In tennis, forty is the value of the third point won by a player in a game. The game score starts at 0, moving to 15, then 30, and eventually 40.

French Open / Roland Garros: The French Open is the second Grand Slam of the year, happening in Paris. Roland Garros is usually played at the end of May on clay courts. Rafael Nadal is considered to be the “king” of the Roland Garros.

Futures: Future tournaments are the lowest level of professional tournaments a player can play in order to obtain ranking points. The prize money and points obtained in futures tournaments are virtually insignificant, however, when compared to ATP, WTA, or Grand Slam tournaments.

Tennis Terms – G

Game: A game is the second stage of the tennis scoring system. In essence, it is an accumulation of 4 or more points won by the same player.

Grand Slam: In tennis, Grand Slams are the 4 biggest tournaments in the world – both in terms of points and prize money. The 4 Grand Slams are the Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, and US Open.

Grass: Considered the most elegant of all surfaces, grass courts are somewhat difficult to find nowadays. Grass courts tend to allow the ball to slide when it bounces, which makes the overall game a lot faster. In addition, the ball tends to stay low and close to the ground, which means that shots with slice are usually more effective than shots with topspin.

Grinding: When a player is fighting really hard to win a match, usually running a lot.

Grip:  In short, grip might mean two things: 1) the part of your racket which you hold; and 2) the way or position in which you hold your racket.

Grooving: In tennis, grooving means playing in a somewhat relaxed way rather than running around the court. Players who are grooving are just hitting balls through the middle of the court, without the intent of playing points or getting competitive.

Grunting: In tennis, grunting is the act of making noises while and after hitting a shot. Players do so for several reasons, including adding extra power to shots all the way through better relaxation.

Tennis Terms – H

Har-Thru: A type of clay court very popular in the United States. These courts are usually blue / green and have a similar feel to regular clay courts – just faster.

Hard Court: Usually classified as hard courts, acrylic or polyurethane court surfaces are by far the most popular courts in the United States. Acrylic tennis courts have a regulating base made with concrete or asphalt and have a finishing wearing surface made of acrylic or polyurethane. Courts with this surface are usually considered medium, medium-fast, or fast. The majority of the biggest professional tournaments are played on acrylic/polyurethane courts, including two Grand Slams (Australian Open and US Open), the ATP Finals, and 6 ATP 1000s (Indian Wells, Miami, Canadian Open, Cincinnati, Shanghai, and Paris).

Hitting: In tennis, hitting usually means that you are practicing but without playing points. It is similar to grooving, but it can be more intense. 

Tennis Terms – I

Inside-In: An inside-in shot is executed when the player is hitting a forehand where he would normally be hitting a backhand or vice-versa. For the shot to be an inside in rather than an inside out, the shot needs to be hit in a straight line rather than diagonally. 

Inside-Out: An inside-out shot is similar to an inside in, but where the shot is hit diagonally to the opponent’s court.

Tennis Terms – K

Kick Serve: A kick serve in tennis is a type of serve in which the player adds a lot of topspin (by hitting the ball from under), which causes the ball to bounce higher after it lands on the opponent’s court.

Tennis Terms – L

Let: The word let can have two different uses in tennis. Both of them mean that essentially either a point or serve will be repeated. The first use of let is when a serve touches the net and lands on the service box – which is a let and means that the serve will be replayed. The second use of let is when a point is interrupted by an external factor (fan running on court, a ball from another court, a dog running around), and this let means that the whole point will be replayed.

Lob: A lob is a shot in which you hit the ball over your opponent while he or she is close to the net.

Long: In tennis, you would call a shot long if it bounces outside of the court lengthwise (past the baseline).

Love: In tennis, love means zero. 

Lucky Loser: A lucky loser is a tennis player who loses in the qualifying rounds, but manages to get into the main draw after a player withdraws from the tournament. 

Tennis Terms – M

Match: In order to win a tennis match, a player needs to win either 2 out of 3 sets or 3 out of 5 sets, depending on the tournament he or she is playing. The vast majority of tennis tournaments works under the “2 out of 3 rule”. What that means is that, in order to win a match, a player needs to win 2 sets before his or her opponent.

Match-point: A match-point means that a player is one point away from winning the match.

Net: The net is the part of the court that divided the court in half. Players must switch sides according to the rules. 

Tennis Terms – N

No-Man-Land: In tennis, no man’s land is the part of the court between the service line and the baseline. This is an area where players should not be standing, as they become very vulnerable. And yet, beginners tend to stand on it. 

Tennis Terms – O

Out: In tennis, out means that a shot landed outside the valid boundaries of the court. A shot that was out results in a lost point. 

Overgrip: Overgrips are cloth-like tapes that are wrapped over the original grip of a tennis racket, working as an extra layer of comfort, stability, and sweat absorption for tennis players.

Overhead: Also called smash in some countries. You must be standing close to the net and hit the ball without bouncing. You need to hit the ball over your head (similarly to a serve), and that is why this shot is named the way it is. 

Tennis Terms – P

Passing Shot: A passing shot happens when one player is at the net and his or her opponent successfully hits a shot that passes around them, landing inside the court. It is different from a lob as a lob goes over the opponent, not around him.

Poach: A poach happens in doubles when the player who is at the net intercepts a shot that was originally aimed at the player standing at the baseline. 

Point Penalty: If tennis players commit more than one code violation, they might receive a point penalty – which means that they lose a point as a punishment for bad behavior.

Pusher: In tennis, a pusher is a player who doesn’t go for shots and is happy to play a defensive style. The term pusher has a bad connotation, as people generally see defensive tennis as ugly tennis. 

Tennis Terms – Q

Qualifying: A qualifying is a separate draw in a tournament for players that did not rank well enough to qualify to the main draw. If players win enough matches in the qualifying draw, they end up securing a spot in the main draw. 

Tennis Terms – R

Rally: A rally in tennis is the act of hitting shots from one side of the court to the other. A rally can occur during a point, or just as a friendly “grooving” between players. 

Return (Of Serve): A return is a shot where one player waits to see where the other player’s serve lands and then attempts to hit the ball back to the other side. A return can be executed in several different ways, with a forehand, backhand, slice, block, or chip. The most important aspect of a return is just getting the ball back to the other side, no matter how.

Tennis Terms – S

Seed: In a tennis tournament, a seed is one of the 8, 16, or 32 top-ranked players, depending on the tournament size and type. These players are placed in special positions in the draw, so they will only face each other in more advanced rounds.

Serve: The serve is the stroke that begins every single shot in a tennis match. While one player is serving, the other is receiving, and they take turns after the end of every game. Serves can take different shapes and forms, but they are generally characterized by a movement where the player swings the racket above his head, while still standing behind the baseline.

Serve And Volley: In tennis, serve and volley is a playing style in which the player tries to immediately reach the net after serving. It was a very popular style in the past, but now it is difficult to find players who adopt this strategy.

Set: A set is the third stage of the tennis scoring system. Once a player accumulates enough games, he or she will win a set. Generally, a player will win a set if he can win 6 games before his opponent can win 5. If one of the players can do that, he will win a set, both players will take a break, and both the point and game counting will go back to 0 x 0.

Shank: A shank in tennis happens when a player hits the ball using the frame of the racket rather than the strings. It generally results in an uncontrolled and non-aimed shot.

Shot: In tennis, a shot happens every time a player makes contact with the ball. A shot is a subdivision of a stroke: a forehand (stroke) can be hit as an inside-out, inside-in, crosscourt, down-the-line, with slice or topspin (shots).

Slice: A slice is essentially a variation of the backhand shot. Instead of hitting the ball on the top, your racquet swings through the bottom of the ball. That adds underspin to the shot, so after the ball bounces on the other side, it stays low and close to the ground.

Stance: In tennis, the term stance relates to how a player positions his or her legs when hitting a shot. Tennis stances are known as open, , semi-open, neutral, and closed.

Strike: Striking means the act of grooving or hitting. Strike can also mean “to hit a shot”.

Stroke: Tennis strokes are the basic movements that must be learned in order to play the sport. These are: forehand, backhand, serve, return, volleys and overhead.

Sweet Spot: The sweet spot is the area in the racket a player should hit the ball with. This is usually near the very center of the racket, and using the sweet spot usually results in great shots.

Tennis Terms – T

T: The T is the area on the court where the service line meets the line that divides it into two boxes. 

Tanking: In tennis, tanking means the act of giving up on a match, and continuing to play without the intention or desire to win.

Thirty: In tennis, thirty is the value of the second point won by a player in a game. The game score starts at 0, moving to 15, then 30, and eventually 40.

Tiebreak: A tiebreak is a special type of game, designed to break a tie between two players (hence the name). Normally, a tiebreak occurs when both players are tied at 6 games to 6. The scoring system in a tiebreak game works differently than regular games (0, 15, 30, 40), and you should count the points using the regular numerical system (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, …). Normally, the first player to reach a total of 7 points wins the tiebreak, also winning the set.

Topspin: Topspin is the effect added to shots when a player hits a ball in a ‘down-to-up’ motion. This is the spin players use in the majority of their shots. It causes the ball to bounce higher after it lands on the opponent’s court.

Touch: Touch is a term that refers to the player’s ability and capacity to hit finessed shots. 

Tweener: Tweeners are one of the most admired shots by tennis fans. When hitting a tweener, a player hits the ball between his or her legs, while having his or her back facing the opponent.

Tennis Terms – U

Umpire: The umpire is the main judge in a tennis match, who sits on the high chair and is responsible for counting the points and applying all the rules.

Underhand Serve: The majority of tennis serves are hit while the ball is over the player’s head, but underhand serves are hit using a different motion – with the ball at knee height. This serve is considered valid yet unethical.

Unforced Error: An unforced error happens when a player is in a relatively comfortable position to hit a shot, but ends up missing (either in an attempt to hit an aggressive shot or because of carelessness).

US Open: The US Open is the fourth Grand Slam of the year, and it is played on hard courts in New York City.

Tennis Terms – V

Volley: Volleys are fairly simple movements, in which you hit the ball without letting it touch the ground. It can be done either on the forehand or backhand side, and it requires firm hands and fast reflexes.

Tennis Terms – W

Walkover: A walkover happens when the player’s opponent fails to show up for the match, allowing the player to advance to the next round without even playing.

Warning: In tennis, a warning is the normal outcome of the player’s first code violation. It is given by the umpire, and it does not cause the player to lose any points.

Western: The Western grip is ideal for players who have a solid baseline game and play on slow courts that require a lot of topspin. However, it also becomes even more difficult to change grips and to hit shots close to the ground.

Wide: In tennis, wide can mean two different things. First, a wide serve is a serve that bounces on the outer side of the service box, causing the opponent to move away from the court. Second, a wide shot is a shot that landed outside of the court lines widthwise. 

Wildcard: A wildcard is an invite to the main draw or qualifying draw of a tournament, even if the player does not have a ranking good enough to qualify to it. It is usually given to injured or local players.

Wimbledon: Wimbledon is the third Grand Slam of the year, played on grass courts in England. It is considered to be the most elegant of all 4 Grand Slams.

Winner: In tennis, a winner is a good shot that successfully goes past the opponent, resulting in a won point. 

WTA: WTA stands for the Women’s Tennis Association, which is the organization that rules everything related to women’s tennis. It is the equivalent of the ATP. 

Tennis Terms – Z

Zero: In tennis, zero means… well, zero. However, it is never used to describe the point score (“love” is always used) and only sometimes to describe the game score (“six-zero”).

MyTennisHQ Interviews: Michael Redlicki


Quick Facts

  • School: Duke University/ University of Arkansas
  • Year Graduated: 2017
  • Current Job: Professional tennis player (ATP #344)

Bio

Mike Redlicki was born on November 16, 1993 in Chicago, Illinois. Around age 16, he and his family moved to Boca Raton, Florida to train at the USTA training center. When he moved, he began online schooling in order to be more flexible for his tennis schedule.

Michael had a very successful junior career before heading to Duke University. He was ranked as high as the #7 recruit in the country. He and partner Dennis Novikov won the 2012 USTA Boys 18 National Championship, which earned them a wildcard into the main draw of the US Open. They advanced to the second round of doubles at the US Open. 

Michael began his college experience at Duke University after his successful junior career. At Duke, he had a career high ranking of #29 in the country and was named to the All-ACC team and All-ACC Academic team. He was also named ITA Carolina Region Rookie of the Year. Redlicki finished his undergrad degree at Duke in 2 and a half years. After competing two seasons at Duke, Redlicki transferred to the University of Arkansas to finish his eligibility and pursue a masters in business administration. At Arkansas, Redlicki became an ITA All-American and qualified for the NCAA Individual tournament in both his seasons. He won the national indoors individual tournament in the fall, giving him the #1 ranking in the country. Redlicki played primarily at the #1 position at Arkansas and was named ITA Central Regional Senior Player of the Year and to the All-SEC first-team his senior year.

After graduating, Redlicki took his talents to professional tennis. During his time on tour Redlicki has achieved a career high ranking of #313 in singles, currently sitting at #344. He has won both a singles and a doubles futures title, earning wins over top players such as Tennys Sandgren.

Personally, I have known Mike and his brother Martin since I started college. Mike has loads of talent and it is clear that his potential to reach the top 100 and beyond is more than prevalent. He admits that once his is able to reign in the mental aspect of the game it will be smooth sailing from there, as his athleticism and ball striking are both off the charts. I root for Mike as hard as anyone else on tour and I know he will achieve his goals! Read Mike’s interview about what he got out of college tennis below and enjoy, this is an informative one!

7 Questions With Michael Redlicki

#1) What was your recruiting/school selection process like?

Oddly enough, I had two recruiting processes. Players usually go through one, but my time was cut short on my first college team and had to finish my eligibility on another. I started talking to coaches as soon as the June 1st date came around my rising senior year, and I was blessed to receive interest from a considerable amount of universities via their letters they would send to my house and Facebook. I always knew that I was going to play for one of a few places from the get-go, so I kept my focus on this idea, while showing appreciation for all the interest that I did receive. My search was quickly refined to three main options: Duke, Illinois, and Michigan.

I’ve had a relationship with Brad Dancer (Illinois Head Coach) since I was young. I have been around him and the Illinois team more than average since I grew up in Chicago. One of my favorite coaches growing up, Mark Merklein, had taken a job at Michigan after we had worked together at the USTA Boca facility in my high school years. I personally prioritized the relationship that I would have with my coach because over the course of years, compatibility would end up being most important as you would get tested as you experience the ups and downs of tennis together.

As soon as an opportunity to play and represent Duke University became an option for me, I could not ignore it and saw it as a life changing opportunity. When choosing a university to play for, I wanted to find the best mix of a good relationship with my coach, a life changing experience studying at that school, and obviously the tennis benefit that playing for a program would give me, since I had very real aspirations to pursue tennis professionally after the fact. I ended up deciding to play for Duke University, and I completed my eligibility at the University of Arkansas with Coach Andy Jackson.

One thing I wish the NCAA would change when it comes to college recruiting is limiting the amount of exposure/time a coach could have with players in person and over the phones. This takes away from the student athlete being able to make the most informed decision for their lives, which I believe defeats the purpose of making such a big decision in the first place. The idea of limiting contact between a coach and player also just doesn’t sound right to me from a principle standpoint.

#2) What was your favorite moment/story/aspect of college?

I will share my favorite moments and aspect. My favorite moment would probably have to be tied between two instances. I am a team focused individual so the experience of being a part of an Arkansas team that started a season unranked and ran it up all the way to being just outside the top 10 at #12 was something I will never forget. The camaraderie that was so present and vibrant on this team was the leading factor in why we were able to achieve as much success as we did. Even though we didn’t take advantage of a massive opportunity at the end of the year with being able to host the Regional rounds of the NCAA tournament in Fayetteville, this still has to be a feeling/experience that will never leave me.

The other experience would have to be my week I had at the 2016 ITA National Indoors in NYC. To this day, it is the craziest week I’ve experienced in my tennis life, and to conclude it with a title on my mother’s birthday made it that much sweeter. I spent the week in NYC with my teammate Jose Salazar and coach Jackson, we stayed in Manhattan, and got to experience unforgettable moments in a packed Times Square, adding to the whole memory.

My favorite aspect of college tennis would have to be the respect that we as student athletes gain from professionals in the real world regarding our time management, work ethic, and our excellence in a discipline as difficult as tennis. These are the only people in my life that have really appreciated what myself and all other athletes have overcome with our nonstop lifestyles, regardless of what we studied at school. It’s a unique feeling to be valued for something that we feel as being just a part of everyday life.

#3) How did college tennis prepare you for the rest of your career/life?

College tennis prepared me for life more so than I had ever expected. In addition to all of the time management and work ethic properties we as student athletes had to develop in school in order to survive (graduate), experiences that I’ve had exposed me to certain ugly truths in the world that I was simply too naïve to accept or understand beforehand. An example would be that you can’t really know what someone, who you believed to be very close to you, is capable of when things don’t go according to plan, or when tribulations test a relationship. More specifically, the change of hearts that I have experienced from those who I thought supported me most, or were in my corner, knocked me on my ass.

My naivety made some of the harder times of my college tennis career hurt more than they might have hurt someone more prepared for life at 20 years old. It forced me to start over, but I am ultimately thankful that I was able to start over with this new perspective. I really think it’s what allowed me to find Coach Jackson and the Arkansas family who have only taken my life and my tennis to new heights, and for that I will forever thank both of you. Woo Pig!!

#4) A lot of juniors and parents worry that tennis will suffer because of the academic demands of college. What advice would you give an 18-year old in terms of balancing academics and tennis?

When it comes to balancing the academic and athletic element, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but with the exception of a select few institutions that are mostly known for their academic prowess, I believe that it comes down to the level of raw intent that comes from the student athlete. I remember how easy I got sucked into the mental trap of not wanting to do homework in a timely manner and rather saved it for the last minute because I was so quick to blame the fatigue that I felt from my two hours of tennis and one hour of fitness. I understand that there are courses of study that require much more classroom presence than others because of the nature of the subject, but if I had a gun to my head, I would have to say that any anguish I felt academically was a result of my own procrastination and occasional mismanagement of time.

I also understand that for a lot of players that come from a homeschool environment during their junior years, the academics might have felt as more of a prerequisite for college tennis rather than an opportunity to advance one’s base of knowledge. My biggest recommendation would be this: try your best to see the academic element of college tennis as an opportunity to better your life skills. Challenge yourself to be optimal at managing your time, and learn to teach yourself that you indeed are capable of doing way more than you originally thought, especially when you’re ‘tired’. I believe it is much more a matter of self-motivation than a matter of simply having too much on your plate.

#5) Another thing we see parents worrying about is how the social component of college will affect their kids tennis. What would you tell an 18-year old going to college in regards to having fun without compromising their tennis/academics?

Another unconventional answer incoming, but it comes from the heart because of my own experience and failure to manage the social/academic/athletic life triangle that is college tennis. My best advice to an 18-year-old would be that chances are you are not going to go about your time perfectly while at school. It is an experience that literally everybody going through the system has. In my opinion, the way to go about the social life balance learning process most effectively is to understand that opportunity will be very prevalent in college, regardless of how little you were involved with outside of tennis, just like I was. There is no shortage of fun to be had in college, because college makes sure of that. With this understanding, hopefully you won’t make decisions based on the idea of FOMO, but you will make decisions that you will tell yourself are in your best long-term interest.

Should you experience the inevitable in the form of having a lapse of judgement, the most critical thing would be NOT to hate yourself, NOT to feel bad for yourself, but to understand that you have an opportunity to learn from your mistake. As you get older, you will start to realize that experience is the best teacher in life, so you need to have a few in order to learn something. If you can keep these principles in mind, your odds that you will come out of school a more well-rounded individual can skyrocket.

My advice to parents, as a new parent myself, is to let their kids live their lives (within reason), and do not try to get involved in the form of preventing your child’s inevitable mistake. It will accelerate their preparation for the real world once they come face to face with it.

#6) Knowing what you know now, what would you do differently if you were starting college again today?

I will keep this short and sweet, since my main point was expressed in the question above regarding learning from mistakes. The things that I would do differently during my near 6 year college tenure would be:

a. Meet people. As many as you can. It might feel awkward or out of place initially, but I wish I had the perspective to do much more of it during my entire 6 years in school. We are going to enter a world in where everyone has the same and correct information, so the differentiating factor will be one’s relationships in life. The saying of “it’s not what you know, but who you know” will prove to be so much more true than any of us have ever thought. Times are changing, and it’s only efficient to change with the times.

b. Give your best effort at anything you do. Yes. This is the most cliché thing I will write all day, but there is so much truth in it. Regardless of what you’re doing in college, if you give less than your best genuine effort, you are only hurting yourself by limiting yourself from experiencing what you’re capable of, and what’s possible.

I had a big difficulty with this in my earlier years, because I took it all for granted. It felt like everything I had was supposed to be that way, and it was simply the next step in my life’s process. I wasn’t able to truly value the opportunity I had being at an institution like Duke, because I let an immaturity distract me and keep me from being my best version of myself during such a pivotal time in my life LOADED with opportunity.

#7) In your case, why did you think that college tennis was a good option as opposed to going directly to the pro tour?

 I believe that it is in everybody’s interest to go to college before committing to a professional career. First and foremost, there is no going back to college on the school’s dollar once you go pro, should you be blessed enough to be playing that game.

Second, you are as far as possible from your physical and mental peak at 18 years old, especially if you’re a guy. You are still a child, who still has a lot to learn about themselves. The argument of there not always being opportunity, but college will always be there doesn’t hold its own water when you see how many young (male) players are actually thriving in their pro tennis careers. 

College was the best way to learn about myself and my tendencies, especially when my parents weren’t looking. Itgives you a chance to learn about life and the world through your own lens and perspective, and these elements of maturity go far undervalued in the context of a mentally taxing professional tennis career. I am so happy that I stuck with my gut with deciding to go to college, and I am ecstatic at the thought that I was able to finesse a 6-year stay. Without it, I wouldn’t have achieved 10% of the ‘success’ I’ve had on tour, and I will preach going to college for development until nobody asks me for my opinion anymore. 

I want to thank Karue and Austin for the opportunity to share my thoughts. I have been blessed with the ultimate mix of highs and lows during my formidable college years, and I have lived through things that have given me insights that I will lean on for the rest of my days. I hope you all enjoyed my twenty cents on this matter. Stay safe during these trying COVID times and prioritize inner peace. It will be the ultimate solution in the end.

MyTennisHQ Interviews: Skander Mansouri


Quick Facts

  • School: Wake Forest
  • Year Graduated: 2018
  • Current Job: Professional tennis player (ATP #

Bio

Skander Mansouri was born on July 23, 1995 in Tunis, Tunisia. After a successful junior career, he was uncertain whether to go pro or go to college. He ultimately decided to go to college at Wake Forest University starting in 2014.

As a junior, Mansouri had success on the ITF Junior reaching a career high ranking of #38 in the world. He competed at the junior events at both Wimbledon and Roland Garros. He was highly sought after by college coaches across the U.S., but when he decided to go to college he chose to attend Wake Forest University.

While playing at Wake Forest, Mansouri became a force in college tennis. His freshman year, Mansouri played at the #3 and #4 positions in singles, and the #1 doubles position with Christian Seraphim. He and Seraphim reached the round of 16 in the NCAA Individuals Tournament and reached a high ranking of #9 in the country. His sophomore year, he became the third player in school history to become an All-American in both singles and doubles. In the NCAA Individuals tournament, he reached the round of 16 in singles, and the quarterfinals in doubles. His junior year, he was once again named a singles and doubles All-American. He was part of the first-ever ITA National Indoor Doubles Championship team, pairing up with Christian Seraphim. His senior year, Wake Forest won both the National Indoor Championships and the NCAA Championships. Skander played primarily at the #2 singles and #2 doubles positions for this team.

After college, Mansouri began to play professionally. Mansouri has reached a career high singles ranking of #303 in the world in singles and #209 in the world in doubles. Skander is a great guy with a great view on the world. College taught him to be well-rounded and he has had great results on the pro tour. I was personally able to spend a week with him on the road last summer. His stories about his college and pro experiences are awesome and I actually learned a lot from them. Please enjoy this interview with Skander Mansouri, we hope you can learn something from him!

7 Questions With Skander Mansouri

#1) What was your recruiting/school selection process like?

At first I was convinced I wanted to go pro right away and not go to college. During my senior year of high school, I talked to a few schools and some of the coaches came to visit me in Tunisia. After talking to them, I felt like the best fit for me was to go with Tony Bresky and that is why I decided to go to Wake Forest. I was looking at a school with good academics but also a coach that was ambitious and that was going to help me become the player I want to be. I committed around may of my senior year of high school.

#2) What was your favorite moment/story/aspect of college?

I think this is a very hard question to answer, especially now that I’m done, I miss everything about it. We had some very good seasons, we were around 25 in the nation my freshman year and I left on the highest note possible after being number 1 and winning NCAA. People would think the best moment was winning the national title, of course, I’m not saying it wasn’t an unbelievable moment, but I think that moment meant what it did because of all the hours and everything we have done as a team. Another unforgettable moment was winning the first ACC championship in the program’s history my sophomore year, beating Virginia in the final that had won it 8 times in a row, that started everything. Looking back at it, the best moments were mostly the simplest moment that you would take for granted hen you are there, pit sits with your friends, team dinners at your coaches house, I never thought I would say it but even the runs with the team. As tennis players we might not have that ever again.

#3) How did college tennis prepare you for the rest of your career/life?

I am on the pro tour and I have been playing since I graduated in 2018, I am ranked 380 in singles and 290 in doubles now. I think college tennis is an excellent preparation for the tour as you play many matches in different conditions and that you have to constantly deal with adversity, weather it is too much school work, lack of sleep or a court that is too fast, you have no other way than try to adapt and overcome.

#4) A lot of juniors and parents worry that tennis will suffer because of the academic demands of college. What advice would you give an 18-year old in terms of balancing academics and tennis?

That is for sure one of the difficulties of college tennis. If you want to do well at school and on the court, it is very possible but it will take some dedication and some good time management skills. I would say the best advise would be to try to be as focus as you can in class in order to use that time efficiently so you have less work to do later on and use the day offs you get in tennis to try to get ahead in school. If you want to do well in both, it is manageable.

#5) Another thing we see parents worrying about is how the social component of college will affect their kids tennis. What would you tell an 18-year old going to college in regards to having fun without compromising their tennis/academics?

I think everyone should have fun in college but the two main things that helped me do both were time management and accountability. If you manage your time well you will have time to have fun that is for sure. However, it will be important to realize when you can do it and when you can not.

#6) Knowing what you know now, what would you do differently if you were starting college again today?

I would personally spend more time with friends and ask more individual sessions than I have. Our coaches were there ready to coach us extra whenever we wanted and I think I could have used that a little better than I have. I took that for granted. Now that I am on the tour by myself I realize how important that was.

#7) In your case, why did you think that college tennis was a good option as opposed to going directly to the pro tour?

I think tennis a sport that requires a lot of maturity. Unless you are doing really well and can afford a team to travel with you, you will have to do many things yourself and college prepares you very well for that I think. I became very accountable when I was in college and gained a lot of autonomy. I also learnt how to manage my time and procrastinate way less. During the years in college you understand that most of the time, everything is not going to go perfectly as planned and that you have to deal with it. Understanding that is helping me a lot today on the tour.

MyTennisHQ Interviews: Catherine Harrison


Quick Facts

  • School: UCLA
  • Year Graduated: 2016
  • Current Job: Professional tennis player (WTA Singles #263, Doubles #194)

Bio

Catherine “Cat” Harrison was born on April 9, 1994 in Memphis, Tennessee. She grew up in Germantown, Tennessee and chose to do online schooling in high school. She joined UCLA in the fall of 2012.

Cat had a successful junior career, leading her to be ranked #10 in her recruiting class going in to college. Additionally, her success on the ITF Junior Circuit had her ranked a career-high No. 104 in the ITF World Junior Rankings. She participated in the Junior Australian Open, Junior Wimbledon and The Junior U.S. Open. She reached the quarterfinals of doubles at the 2011 Junior US Open. 

After her junior career she decided to play at UCLA, where she really developed and found her game. The results followed, as she ended up a 3x doubles All-American and a singles All-American her senior year. Her senior year, she was also named the ITA Southwest Region Senior Player of the Year and named to the PAC-12 First Team. Her biggest jump in results happened when she won the PAC-12 individual singles tournament. There, she beat the top players in the entire conference while she was playing #4 and #5 on her own team. She and partner Kyle McPhillips also reached the semifinals of the NCAA doubles tournament. She finished this year ranked number 5 in doubles. She and McPhillips finished the season ranked in the top 10 three straight seasons. 

After playing at UCLA, Harrison began to play professionally. She has career high rankings of 256 in the world in singles and 186 in the world in doubles. I got to know Cat well in my time at UCLA and I love seeing her find success on the pro tour because she deserves it. She works her butt off and competes harder than anyone. I’m sure this is just the beginning, but it is impressive that she has achieved such high rankings after starting her college career in the bottom of UCLA’s lineup. That can be attributed to 2 things: there is a high level to be found in college tennis, and there is ample opportunity to improve. Hear what Cat has to say about her experience below… enjoy! 

7 Questions With Catherine Harrison

#1) What was your recruiting/school selection process like?

My recruiting process was actually pretty abnormal. Playing professional tennis has always been my main goal, but both of my parents played college tennis, so it was important to me to follow in their footsteps before starting on tour. I started looking at schools and taking unofficial visits extremely early – my first one being at the end of my freshman year of high school. Essentially the only thing I was looking for in a school was a coach that could continue to develop me as a player.

Initially, I narrowed my search down to three schools (Duke, UVA, and Georgia Tech) and ultimately decided on Georgia Tech at the beginning of my junior year. Their coach had a reputation as one of the best in college, and had a successful pro career himself. But, 8 weeks before school began, he left to become the head men’s coach at the University of Florida – leaving me with a big decision. The only top-20 school with a scholarship open that late in the game was UCLA. I’d always loved the west coast, so in the three days after the GT coach left, I called Stella (UCLA Head Coach), flew to California to take my visit, fell in love with the school and signed my NLI.

#2) What was your favorite moment/story/aspect of college?

It’s hard to pick just one moment as my favorite about college, but winning the NCAA team championship in 2014 has to top the list. As a team we suffered some huge disappointments that season, losing 4-3 in the PAC12 conference final and in the finals of National Indoors (with multiple championship points in both – yikes). It really was a dream come true to be able to overcome a lot of doubt that had been created during the season and win in the biggest moment.

Also as an individual, another amazingly cool experience was winning the PAC12 singles title my junior year. Up until then I had played 5 on the team, and had never been ranked anywhere inside the top 60. That week, I had four top 20 wins and beat the number one players from Utah, Stanford, USC, Oregon, and Cal – setting me up to play number one my senior year, which had been the goal I’d written down before starting college. To see three years of work culminate with a title was so amazing, and it is still to this day one of the most rewarding feelings I’ve ever had.

#3) How did college tennis prepare you for the rest of your career/life?

My current job is a professional tennis player – right now I’m ranked 263 in singles and 194 in doubles. I’m sure this is a common theme echoed by former college players, but the biggest lesson I learned in school was how to juggle a crazy amount of responsibility without getting overwhelmed.

Although I’m getting close to the qualifying draw of grand slams, I’m still a ways away from having a full time manager to help me with my career. So, I’m solely responsible for booking flights to tournaments, making hotel reservations, making sure I’m watching entry & withdrawal deadlines on both the ITF & WTA platforms, all of my equipment, setting up practices, organizing fitness when I’m not traveling, finding sponsors – and this is everything I have to do before even thinking about how to win a match.

There’s no way I was mentally or emotionally prepared to manage all of this at 18, before I went to college. If I didn’t go through the experience of balancing the quarter system with tennis, a social life and being a part of several extra-curricular groups, I can say almost certainly I wouldn’t have survived even a couple months on the pro tour.

#4) A lot of juniors and parents worry that tennis will suffer because of the academic demands of college. What advice would you give an 18-year old in terms of balancing academics and tennis?

The best advice I can offer a player worried about tennis suffering in college is to choose the program with the coach you connect with the most. Balancing academics and tennis in college is a whole different ball game than in high school, and it’s important to be able to have someone built in that you can lean on when needed. Your college coach will dictate a lot of your life during school, so choose to play for someone who you think is interested in your holistic success, as opposed to someone only interested in how you can get wins for their team.

#5) Another thing we see parents worrying about is how the social component of college will affect their kids tennis. What would you tell an 18-year old going to college in regards to having fun without compromising their tennis/academics?

The best advice I can give in terms of balancing academics and tennis is to communicate – with coaches, professions, TAs, and whatever other support staff you have. As athletes we are extremely privileged to have a wide array of support staff – do not be too proud to use them. If you’re feeling stressed, overwhelmed, or you need advice on how to organize or study, it doesn’t do you any good to keep it to yourself and will only contribute to your anxiety.

I did a pretty terrible job at this my freshman year, and my tennis and social life suffered because I tried to balance everything on my own. If I had it to do over, I would have leaned on all of my support staff much more than I did, instead of being stubborn and thinking I could figure everything out on my own

Cat with head coach Stella Sampras after PAC-12 title.
Photo: The Daily Bruin

#6) Knowing what you know now, what would you do differently if you were starting college again today?

This will probably sound cliché, but if I were to start college again I would tell my younger self to enjoy every moment as much as I could. My first two years I was very much a perfectionist and not enjoying much at all – I was obsessed with getting the best grades and winning every match, and berated myself when either or both did not happen. I still had the mindset typical of a top junior – that everything was about me, if I was going out and having fun I wasn’t working hard enough, if I lost a match I wasn’t supposed to the world was ending, etc.

Luckily, the summer before my junior year, a good friend sat me down and pointed out that I was essentially wasting some of the best years of my life by worrying about inconsequential things that, in the long run, wouldn’t matter. This conversation ended up being the best thing that ever happened to my collegiate career, and completely opened my eyes to the idea of a less stressful, well-rounded college experience instead of the hyper-disciplined and stressful one I was currently living.

I actually started to let myself learn from losses instead of getting discouraged, go out with friends without feeling guilty, and be happy with the occasional B in a class. Not shockingly, less stress and perfectionism led to much better results, and my last two years were by far the best results I had on the court and the best times I had off the court.

#7) In your case, why did you think that college tennis was a good option as opposed to going directly to the pro tour?

For me, going to college before turning pro was always the path I wanted to take. I’m a pretty giant dork who really enjoys learning, and I did all of my high school online. I really wanted to get back in a classroom and learn in a traditional setting before turning pro, so going straight on tour from high school was never really a viable path for me. Like I mentioned earlier, I definitely wasn’t emotionally or physically prepared for the demands of the pro tour. Going to college taught me how to balance a lot of stress and responsibility at once, and definitely helps me to this day with my life on the pro tour.

MyTennisHQ Interviews: Mackenzie McDonald


Quick Facts

  • School: UCLA
  • Years at School: 2013-2016 (turned pro after junior year)
  • Current Job: Professional tennis player (career high ATP #57)

Bio

Mackenzie “Mackie” McDonald was born April 16,1995 in Piedmont, California. He attended Piedmont High School before going on to have a very successful college career at UCLA.

During his junior career, Mackie had success both in the United States and internationally. This success led him to be ranked #12 on the ITF junior world tour.  He competed in all 4 junior grand slams before going to college. Some of his best junior results include winning the Easter Bowl ITF and reaching the semifinals at the 2012 Junior Australian Open. Mackie caught a lot of people’s attention when he took out Stevie Johnson at the Masters 1000 event in Cincinnati before going to UCLA.

Upon entering college at UCLA, Mackie was ranked as the #1 incoming freshman in 2013. As a freshman, Mackie was named a singles All-American, the Pac-12 Freshman/Newcomer of the Year, and reached the quarterfinals of the NCAA singles tournament. His 18-4 dual match record earned him a ranking of #23 in the country. During his sophomore season, McDonald was once again named an All-American in singles. He was also named the Pac-12 Player of the Year while playing #1 singles and doubles for the Bruins. McDonald reached a high of #2 in the country during his sophomore year. His best results at UCLA came during his junior year when he captured both the singles and doubles championships in the NCAA Individual tournament. Playing at #1 singles and doubles, McDonald compiled a 22-1 singles record and a 19-6 doubles record. He was awarded a wildcard into the main draw at the US Open in both singles and doubles competition because of his NCAA championships.

Given these remarkable results and showing that he was dominant at the college level, Mackie decided to forgo his senior season at UCLA and turn pro. Mackie has had great success on the ATP tour, reaching a career high ranking of #57 in the world. McDonald has competed in the main draw of all four grand slams, with his best result coming at Wimbledon in 2018, where he eventually fell to Milos Raonic. Unfortunately, he was injured at the 2019 French Open and was unable to play another tournament for the rest of the year. During this sidelining, Mackie enrolled in classes at UCLA to get closer to finishing his degree.

While at UCLA, I grew close to Mackie and spent a lot of time with him, most of that time being off court. If you didn’t know who he was, you wouldn’t suspect that he was one of our game’s rising stars until you saw him crush a backhand return winner. Mackie is sure to be back stronger than ever when he is able to compete again and it is only a matter of time before everyone in the tennis world is talking about him.

Now let’s cut to the chase… we are pleased to give you our interview with: Mackie McDonald!

7 Questions With Mackie McDonald

#1) What was your recruiting/school selection process like?

I committed to UCLA during the summer of 2013. I signed in the apartment my dad and I were living in at the time in Berkeley, CAli for is. I have a long family line of Bruins including my Grandpa, Uncle, Aunt, Dad, and Sister. I was debating between three California schools with my main goal of finding the school that would best fit my personality and also assist me to become a professional tennis player. I did not seriously consider moving east of California for school, so I did not take many visits. In the end, I chose UCLA because it is a highly ranked academic university that gave me the tools I needed to become a professional.

#2) What was your favorite moment/story/aspect of college?

Looking back on my college career, I mainly miss the camaraderie with my teammates. The simple things of playing cards, hanging out in the team room, throwing ragers at the tennis house, and traveling as a team on trips. My favorite on court memories are winning the NCAA singles and doubles in 2016 and clinching the Pac-12 title under the lights in Ojai my junior year against Cal (Berkeley).

#3) How did college tennis prepare you for the rest of your career/life?

College tennis helped me prepare for the professionals. I did not believe I was ready to turn pro at the age of 18, and college was my stepping stone to develop physically and mentally all while getting a world class education. I played a ton of tennis in the three years I was attending college, which gave me experience, a competitive environment, and an understanding of my game. I learned how to work in the gym, how to manage my time, and how to work with a team as a student athlete.

#4) A lot of juniors and parents worry that tennis will suffer because of the academic demands of college. What advice would you give an 18-year old in terms of balancing academics and tennis?

I personally feel that if you are debating going to college or pro, the answer should be to go to college. 18 year olds should only go pro if there are concrete opportunities and sufficient reason behind it. That means winning a junior grand slam, being top 10 in the ITF rankings, or being a ranked professional passed the futures level. Balancing academics, tennis, and social time is an art, and it is important to learn the best ways to manage your time once you step foot on campus. That being said, I do not think you can go wrong with going to college unless you choose the wrong college for yourself.

#5) Another thing we see parents worrying about is how the social component of college will affect their kids tennis. What would you tell an 18-year old going to college in regards to having fun without compromising their tennis/academics?

I would say that the opportunity to go professional is always there once you go to college, but the door closes for a college experience once you go pro. As I said in the previous answer, balancing academics, tennis, and social time is an art, and it is very important to learn the best ways to manage your time once you step foot on campus. I also believe that going pro out of college does demand a special tennis regimen, schedule, and plan. Sacrifices need to be made in order to stand out in college, make the line up, or move on to the pros. 

Mackie spars with Roger Federer at the 2017 US Open.
Photo: youtube

#6) Knowing what you know now, what would you do differently if you were starting college again today?

I do not think I would do anything differently if I could start my college career over. I think that I had a healthy balance of “being professional”, having fun, taking care of my studies, and planning my future. I went through many learning experiences that forced me to fail before I learned to succeed. I could say I would want to not have failed in some of my experiences, but looking back those moment are what motivated and drove me to become the player and person I am today.

#7) In your case, why did you think that college tennis was a good option as opposed to going directly to the pro tour?

I 100% believe that college tennis was a good option for me at the age of 18 coming out of juniors. Being on a team, competing for a school, and representing more than yourself is something you do not get to do in tennis very often. The memories I created on and off the court at UCLA are some of the most memorable moments of my life. I created relationships I will always have, and went through experiences that many professional tennis players will never encounter. I grew mentally and physically as a person and as a player. When I chose to go professional after my junior year on my terms, I committed fully and was confident that I was ready for the next level.